Rachel Reeves will rewrite the government’s fiscal rules in next week’s budget to allow her to increase borrowing for public investment by around £50bn.
Speaking to Sky News in Washington DC, the chancellor said that the self-imposed rule under which borrowing must be falling by the fifth year of economic forecasts will be redefined from the current measure of public sector net debt.
Ms Reeves would not be drawn on what measure will replace the current rule but there is speculation that she will favour using public sector debt net of financial liabilities (PSNFL).
Under this definition, investments such as the government’s student loans book are defined as assets rather than liabilities, which on current measures would allow a further £53bn of borrowing.
Charge motorists for every mile they drive, chancellor urged – Money latest
The chancellor said the second fiscal rule, under which day-to-day spending must be funded from government revenue rather than borrowing, would be unchanged.
Growing consensus
Ms Reeves cited support for increasing the debt threshold from leading British economists, as well as the International Monetary Fund, which this week said public investment should be protected and was “badly needed” in the UK.
She insisted the change was necessary to end years of declining public investment and deliver on Labour‘s promise to deliver growth.
“Under the plans that I have inherited from the previous Conservative government, public sector net investment as a share of our economy was due to decline steeply during the course of this parliament,” she said.
“I don’t want that path for Britain when there are so many opportunities in industries from life sciences to carbon capture, storage and clean energy to AI and technology, as well as the need to repair our crumbling schools and hospitals.”
Read more on the budget:
What could Chancellor Rachel Reeves announce?
Chancellor Rachel Reeves looking to ‘find £40bn’ in budget
Ms Reeves denied that she was effectively fiddling the rules to get around her manifesto pledge not to increase income tax, VAT or national insurance.
“The rule that really bites is the first rule, the stability rule, to get day-to-day spending funded by tax receipts. That’s something that the previous government weren’t even trying to achieve and we will show in the budget next week how we will deliver on that promise.
“The second role is about being responsible. By seizing the opportunities, but doing it in a way where we are making sure we’re getting value for money for every pound of taxpayers’ money spent.
“Of course we’ll put guardrails in place to ensure that every pound of taxpayers’ money that is spent is spent wisely, and will involve the National Audit Office and the Office of Budget Responsibility in that.”
The first test of the change in the debt rule will be the reaction of bond markets, which rose slightly on Thursday following reports of Ms Reeves’s plans.
Taken together, the redefined fiscal rules set the terms of a budget that is likely to see tax rises and public spending cuts balanced by more freedom to borrow.
Tax rises not ruled out
Ms Reeves did not rule out a raft of tax rises, including adding national insurance to employers’ pension contributions, from which public sector employers may be exempt.
“I was clear in the statement I made to the House of Commons in July that there will be difficult decisions in this budget around spending, welfare and taxation. But the precise details I will set out to the House of Commons next week.
“I will be a responsible chancellor. I will be honest and transparent about the challenges we face, but also how we’ll fix them to wipe the slate clean after the mismanagement we’ve seen in the last few years under the Conservatives.”
Gareth Davies, shadow exchequer secretary, said: “Before the election Rachel Reeves promised that she would not ‘fiddle’ the fiscal rules, and now it seems she is going to do exactly that. Remarkably she is announcing this not to Parliament, but to the IMF in advance of the budget.
“This is already having real world effects, with borrowing costs rising. This uncertainty over additional borrowing risks interest rates staying higher and for longer. It’s families up and down the country who would pay the price.”
